<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 758 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408862</link>
    <description>Section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for income attributable to banking or credit facilities provided to members, and under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 a nominal member is included within the statutory definition of member. On that basis, income from loans advanced to nominal members falls within the deduction where the governing state law treats them as members. An earlier Supreme Court decision was distinguished because it arose under a different statutory framework that did not recognise nominal members as members, while later Supreme Court and jurisdictional High Court interpretations supported the broader reading. The deduction was therefore held allowable for such income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:12:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 758 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408862</link>
      <description>Section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for income attributable to banking or credit facilities provided to members, and under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 a nominal member is included within the statutory definition of member. On that basis, income from loans advanced to nominal members falls within the deduction where the governing state law treats them as members. An earlier Supreme Court decision was distinguished because it arose under a different statutory framework that did not recognise nominal members as members, while later Supreme Court and jurisdictional High Court interpretations supported the broader reading. The deduction was therefore held allowable for such income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>