<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 752 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (AO) had not erred in accepting the short-term capital loss claim. The AO had conducted a thorough enquiry, leading to the Tribunal quashing the PCIT&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 752 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to invoke revisional powers under Section 263 as the Assessing Officer (AO) had not erred in accepting the short-term capital loss claim. The AO had conducted a thorough enquiry, leading to the Tribunal quashing the PCIT&#039;s order and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>