<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 750 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment, thus deeming the notice under Section 148 as legally flawed. Consequently, all subsequent actions by the AO were nullified. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessment reopening was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 750 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have a valid &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment, thus deeming the notice under Section 148 as legally flawed. Consequently, all subsequent actions by the AO were nullified. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessment reopening was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>