<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408850</link>
    <description>An appeal should not be dismissed solely for alleged non-compliance with predeposit where the duty demand had already been discharged through debit of cenvat credit and interest had been paid in cash; the dismissal on that technical ground was therefore unsustainable. The transitional treatment of education cess and secondary education cess also required examination of the relevant transitional-credit framework, including Section 140 of the CGST Act, the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the CBIC circular, before any merits-based disposal. As no finding had been returned on the demand itself, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits after considering the applicable provisions and after observing natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 746 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408850</link>
      <description>An appeal should not be dismissed solely for alleged non-compliance with predeposit where the duty demand had already been discharged through debit of cenvat credit and interest had been paid in cash; the dismissal on that technical ground was therefore unsustainable. The transitional treatment of education cess and secondary education cess also required examination of the relevant transitional-credit framework, including Section 140 of the CGST Act, the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the CBIC circular, before any merits-based disposal. As no finding had been returned on the demand itself, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits after considering the applicable provisions and after observing natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>