<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 734 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408838</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s objections. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 12,37,886, finding the transactions genuine and supported by evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer lacked justification in treating the capital gain as bogus based solely on received information, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 734 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408838</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s objections. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 12,37,886, finding the transactions genuine and supported by evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer lacked justification in treating the capital gain as bogus based solely on received information, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>