<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 725 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2013-14, condoning a 52-day delay in filing. The additions under sections 68 and 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act were deleted by the CIT(A) after verifying loan confirmations and other documents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal precedents in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 725 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Year 2013-14, condoning a 52-day delay in filing. The additions under sections 68 and 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act were deleted by the CIT(A) after verifying loan confirmations and other documents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal precedents in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>