<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 723 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that lease rentals collected for supplying &#039;manifold/Super Gas system&#039; were not liable to service tax as effective control and possession of goods were transferred to customers. Therefore, the extended period of limitation, interest under Section 75, and penalties under Section 77 &amp;amp; 78 were not applicable. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 723 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that lease rentals collected for supplying &#039;manifold/Super Gas system&#039; were not liable to service tax as effective control and possession of goods were transferred to customers. Therefore, the extended period of limitation, interest under Section 75, and penalties under Section 77 &amp;amp; 78 were not applicable. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>