<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1468 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295859</link>
    <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of administrative expenditure under section 14A, stating that the disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income itself. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was not justified as the exempt income did not exceed the specified amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:09:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1468 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295859</link>
      <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of administrative expenditure under section 14A, stating that the disallowance cannot exceed the exempt income itself. Additionally, the Tribunal held that the charging of interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was not justified as the exempt income did not exceed the specified amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>