https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295851 The court held that inserting a date on an undated cheque does not constitute material alteration under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the holder in due course has implied authority to do so. The defendant failed to prove that the cheque was issued without consideration, as required by Section 118 of the Act. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment of the single judge. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:26:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295851 The court held that inserting a date on an undated cheque does not constitute material alteration under Section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as the holder in due course has implied authority to do so. The defendant failed to prove that the cheque was issued without consideration, as required by Section 118 of the Act. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment of the single judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295851