<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295849</link>
    <description>In a warrant case instituted on a complaint, once charges are framed the Magistrate cannot revert to the pre-charge stage by deleting the charges and discharging the accused. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 treats discharge and acquittal as distinct stages, and after charge the trial must proceed to its lawful conclusion. An order passed after framing charge and before trial completion is therefore illegal. Such an order does not amount to a valid acquittal, so the revisional court may set it aside and direct further proceedings. The plea of autrefois acquit or double jeopardy fails where there has been no valid trial on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 198 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295849</link>
      <description>In a warrant case instituted on a complaint, once charges are framed the Magistrate cannot revert to the pre-charge stage by deleting the charges and discharging the accused. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 treats discharge and acquittal as distinct stages, and after charge the trial must proceed to its lawful conclusion. An order passed after framing charge and before trial completion is therefore illegal. Such an order does not amount to a valid acquittal, so the revisional court may set it aside and direct further proceedings. The plea of autrefois acquit or double jeopardy fails where there has been no valid trial on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>