https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295845 The court held that the plaintiff hospital did not qualify as a charitable institution under the relevant municipal acts due to collecting substantial fees and rents without providing free treatment to a significant percentage of patients. It found no evidence of mala fide intent in canceling the tax exemption resolution, concluding that the municipal authority had the power to withdraw the exemption if criteria were not met. Consequently, the court set aside prior judgments and decrees, dismissing the suit and allowing the Letter Patent Appeal without costs. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:14:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295845 The court held that the plaintiff hospital did not qualify as a charitable institution under the relevant municipal acts due to collecting substantial fees and rents without providing free treatment to a significant percentage of patients. It found no evidence of mala fide intent in canceling the tax exemption resolution, concluding that the municipal authority had the power to withdraw the exemption if criteria were not met. Consequently, the court set aside prior judgments and decrees, dismissing the suit and allowing the Letter Patent Appeal without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295845