<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Penalties Upheld for Customs Duty Evasion and Forgery u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58452</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and 114A of CA - Evasion of Customs Duty - Forging of signature - high seas sale - allegation is that appellant had prior knowledge about the importer firms begin dummy - The appellant has failed in his duty as H- Cardholder and actively involved himself in facilitating evasion of customs duty. The appellant was given specific responsibility by revenue by making him an H- Card Holder. He cannot simply pass the blame to his superior G- Card Holder - the charges under section 112(a) of the customs act as well as 114A of the customs act are upheld. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:14:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:14:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Penalties Upheld for Customs Duty Evasion and Forgery u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58452</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and 114A of CA - Evasion of Customs Duty - Forging of signature - high seas sale - allegation is that appellant had prior knowledge about the importer firms begin dummy - The appellant has failed in his duty as H- Cardholder and actively involved himself in facilitating evasion of customs duty. The appellant was given specific responsibility by revenue by making him an H- Card Holder. He cannot simply pass the blame to his superior G- Card Holder - the charges under section 112(a) of the customs act as well as 114A of the customs act are upheld. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:14:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>