<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 536 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295840</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and restoring the order of the State Commission. The National Commission&#039;s view that the Contract Act does not apply to complaints under the Consumer Protection Act was deemed erroneous. The respondent&#039;s complaint was found maintainable under Section 230 of the Contract Act. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 10:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 536 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295840</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and restoring the order of the State Commission. The National Commission&#039;s view that the Contract Act does not apply to complaints under the Consumer Protection Act was deemed erroneous. The respondent&#039;s complaint was found maintainable under Section 230 of the Contract Act. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>