https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408824 The court ruled in favor of the writ-applicants, quashing the impugned order dated 19.10.2020. The court emphasized that retrospective cancellation of the registration certificate based on allegations of non-genuine transactions would adversely affect valid transactions and penalize innocent parties. The court found the respondent authority's actions to be without jurisdiction and contrary to the previous judgment, directing the restoration of the registration certificate to the writ-applicants. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408824 The court ruled in favor of the writ-applicants, quashing the impugned order dated 19.10.2020. The court emphasized that retrospective cancellation of the registration certificate based on allegations of non-genuine transactions would adversely affect valid transactions and penalize innocent parties. The court found the respondent authority's actions to be without jurisdiction and contrary to the previous judgment, directing the restoration of the registration certificate to the writ-applicants. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408824