<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408822</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The disallowance of bad debts written off, treatment of PMC expenditure as revenue expenditure, provision written back disallowance, and book profit disallowance under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act were all ruled in favor of the assessee based on detailed evidence and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 718 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408822</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The disallowance of bad debts written off, treatment of PMC expenditure as revenue expenditure, provision written back disallowance, and book profit disallowance under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act were all ruled in favor of the assessee based on detailed evidence and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>