<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 710 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408814</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act against the appellant for facilitating imports using fictitious entities, failing KYC verification, and forging signatures. The appellant&#039;s defense was rejected, emphasizing Customs Brokers&#039; duty in verifying import details and document authenticity. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of compliance with KYC norms and import document authenticity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 710 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408814</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act against the appellant for facilitating imports using fictitious entities, failing KYC verification, and forging signatures. The appellant&#039;s defense was rejected, emphasizing Customs Brokers&#039; duty in verifying import details and document authenticity. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of compliance with KYC norms and import document authenticity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>