<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 34 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25746</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the deduction of legal expenses, affirming that such expenses were not admissible. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the disallowance of part of the remuneration paid to the London agents, noting the lack of evidence for extra-commercial considerations in the current assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 34 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25746</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the deduction of legal expenses, affirming that such expenses were not admissible. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the disallowance of part of the remuneration paid to the London agents, noting the lack of evidence for extra-commercial considerations in the current assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>