<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 690 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH—II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408794</link>
    <description>Documentary proof of accepted fixed deposits and the agreed interest terms was treated as sufficient to establish the depositor&#039;s entitlement to repayment. Objections based on alleged KYC deficiencies and third-party collateral claims did not defeat relief on the materials before the Tribunal. The company was therefore directed to return the matured deposit amount with the contracted rate of interest within thirty days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 690 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH—II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408794</link>
      <description>Documentary proof of accepted fixed deposits and the agreed interest terms was treated as sufficient to establish the depositor&#039;s entitlement to repayment. Objections based on alleged KYC deficiencies and third-party collateral claims did not defeat relief on the materials before the Tribunal. The company was therefore directed to return the matured deposit amount with the contracted rate of interest within thirty days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>