<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295831</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Financial Creditors against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order disposing of the Company Petition based on Joint Consent Terms was deemed not maintainable. The Authority directed the Corporate Debtor to settle remaining claims within three months, allowing dissatisfied parties to re-agitate the matter. The judgment emphasized the importance of resolving disputes in Housing Projects, acknowledged the impact of COVID-19 on business operations, and highlighted the seriousness of the settlement process. The dismissal of the appeal did not preclude the Appellants from seeking recourse if their claims remained unsettled by the Corporate Debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:40:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295831</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Financial Creditors against the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order disposing of the Company Petition based on Joint Consent Terms was deemed not maintainable. The Authority directed the Corporate Debtor to settle remaining claims within three months, allowing dissatisfied parties to re-agitate the matter. The judgment emphasized the importance of resolving disputes in Housing Projects, acknowledged the impact of COVID-19 on business operations, and highlighted the seriousness of the settlement process. The dismissal of the appeal did not preclude the Appellants from seeking recourse if their claims remained unsettled by the Corporate Debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>