<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1895 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295829</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D. It was held that section 14A could not be invoked due to the absence of dividend income earned by the assessee, aligning with a Jurisdictional High Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:40:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1895 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295829</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D. It was held that section 14A could not be invoked due to the absence of dividend income earned by the assessee, aligning with a Jurisdictional High Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>