<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Upholds Committee of Creditors&#039; Decision on Priority and Security Interest in Resolution Plan.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58439</link>
    <description>Approval of the resolution plan - dissenting financial creditor - order of priority among the creditors as also the priority and value of the security interest of a secured creditor - The extent of value receivable by the appellant is distinctly given out in the resolution plan i.e., a sum of INR 2.026 crores which is in the same proportion and percentage as provided to the other secured financial creditors with reference to their respective admitted claims. - the business decision taken in exercise of the commercial wisdom of CoC does not call for interference - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Upholds Committee of Creditors&#039; Decision on Priority and Security Interest in Resolution Plan.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58439</link>
      <description>Approval of the resolution plan - dissenting financial creditor - order of priority among the creditors as also the priority and value of the security interest of a secured creditor - The extent of value receivable by the appellant is distinctly given out in the resolution plan i.e., a sum of INR 2.026 crores which is in the same proportion and percentage as provided to the other secured financial creditors with reference to their respective admitted claims. - the business decision taken in exercise of the commercial wisdom of CoC does not call for interference - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:50:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>