https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408786 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was considered in a GST-related matter involving allegations that the petitioner, acting with co-accused persons, operated a locker and removed crucial documents bearing on pending proceedings under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The allegations were treated as specific and serious rather than vague, and custodial interrogation was viewed as necessary to trace the petitioner's role and the alleged concealment or removal of material evidence. Anticipatory bail was therefore not granted, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408786 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was considered in a GST-related matter involving allegations that the petitioner, acting with co-accused persons, operated a locker and removed crucial documents bearing on pending proceedings under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The allegations were treated as specific and serious rather than vague, and custodial interrogation was viewed as necessary to trace the petitioner's role and the alleged concealment or removal of material evidence. Anticipatory bail was therefore not granted, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408786