<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 672 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408776</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant, Ms. Marina J Mahi, in a case involving the misdeclaration of an imported vehicle&#039;s value, breach of sale restrictions, and duty liabilities. The judgment clarified that the appellant, as a possessor of the vehicle under a lease agreement, was not willfully involved in breaching import conditions. Differential duty liabilities were deemed non-transferable to the appellant, aligning with precedents on importer liability under the Customs Act. The confiscation of the vehicle for misdeclaration and sale restriction breaches was upheld, with the appeal focusing on overturning the penalty, ensuring protection from recovery proceedings related to duty and fines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 672 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408776</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant, Ms. Marina J Mahi, in a case involving the misdeclaration of an imported vehicle&#039;s value, breach of sale restrictions, and duty liabilities. The judgment clarified that the appellant, as a possessor of the vehicle under a lease agreement, was not willfully involved in breaching import conditions. Differential duty liabilities were deemed non-transferable to the appellant, aligning with precedents on importer liability under the Customs Act. The confiscation of the vehicle for misdeclaration and sale restriction breaches was upheld, with the appeal focusing on overturning the penalty, ensuring protection from recovery proceedings related to duty and fines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>