https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408775 The appellant challenged an order enhancing the assessable value, resulting in a significant duty demand. The impugned goods were confiscated with a penalty imposed under the Customs Act. Disputes arose over the revision in classification, allegations of deliberate evasion of customs duties, misdeclaration of goods, correctness of classification by the Textile Committee, and the legal authority of the impugned order for recovery of duty, confiscation, and penalty. The appellant contested these issues, arguing against complicity in consigning undeclared goods and seeking to set aside the impugned order. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408775 The appellant challenged an order enhancing the assessable value, resulting in a significant duty demand. The impugned goods were confiscated with a penalty imposed under the Customs Act. Disputes arose over the revision in classification, allegations of deliberate evasion of customs duties, misdeclaration of goods, correctness of classification by the Textile Committee, and the legal authority of the impugned order for recovery of duty, confiscation, and penalty. The appellant contested these issues, arguing against complicity in consigning undeclared goods and seeking to set aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408775