<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, setting aside earlier orders and restoring the issue for verification of actual costs of specific flats mentioned in the documents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering prevailing market values and the need for a fresh assessment based on concrete evidence, highlighting the lack of substantial material to support extrapolation of discrepancies to all sales made over three years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, setting aside earlier orders and restoring the issue for verification of actual costs of specific flats mentioned in the documents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering prevailing market values and the need for a fresh assessment based on concrete evidence, highlighting the lack of substantial material to support extrapolation of discrepancies to all sales made over three years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>