<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 651 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408755</link>
    <description>The Appeals were filed by two Financial Creditors seeking to be part of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). They challenged the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision on their related party status. The Adjudicating Authority emphasized procedural compliance and timely communication, dismissing infructuous applications and urging efficient case management. The Tribunal declined to grant a stay on CoC meetings, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution and cooperation among parties. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to promptly decide pending applications for the smooth continuation of the CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 651 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408755</link>
      <description>The Appeals were filed by two Financial Creditors seeking to be part of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). They challenged the Resolution Professional&#039;s decision on their related party status. The Adjudicating Authority emphasized procedural compliance and timely communication, dismissing infructuous applications and urging efficient case management. The Tribunal declined to grant a stay on CoC meetings, emphasizing the need for expeditious resolution and cooperation among parties. It directed the Adjudicating Authority to promptly decide pending applications for the smooth continuation of the CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>