<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 645 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408749</link>
    <description>The High Court extended by three months the time for the Tribunal to dispose of the pending appeal, which had not been decided within the stipulated period under the earlier order. The earlier conditions were directed to continue unchanged. The document reflects a procedural extension of time in an income-tax matter, without altering the substantive position of the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 645 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408749</link>
      <description>The High Court extended by three months the time for the Tribunal to dispose of the pending appeal, which had not been decided within the stipulated period under the earlier order. The earlier conditions were directed to continue unchanged. The document reflects a procedural extension of time in an income-tax matter, without altering the substantive position of the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>