https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295801 The existence of a statutory supervisory temple committee did not oust the Civil Court's ordinary jurisdiction to frame a scheme for a religious trust, because the statutory remedy was cumulative and the committee's powers were supervisory rather than exclusive. However, any court-framed scheme had to preserve the committee's statutory superintendence and could not materially impair its control. Provisions creating an independent board of control or giving a treasurer autonomous managerial authority were rejected, while measures such as committee-appointed trustees, fixed tenure, a paid cashier, annual budgeting, auditing, publication of accounts, and restrictions on alienation were approved only in modified form. en-us Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295801 The existence of a statutory supervisory temple committee did not oust the Civil Court's ordinary jurisdiction to frame a scheme for a religious trust, because the statutory remedy was cumulative and the committee's powers were supervisory rather than exclusive. However, any court-framed scheme had to preserve the committee's statutory superintendence and could not materially impair its control. Provisions creating an independent board of control or giving a treasurer autonomous managerial authority were rejected, while measures such as committee-appointed trustees, fixed tenure, a paid cashier, annual budgeting, auditing, publication of accounts, and restrictions on alienation were approved only in modified form. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295801