<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295800</link>
    <description>The court set aside the consent decree dated 16th September 2012, appointed a court receiver to take possession of the suit premises, and directed the trial court to expedite the suit&#039;s hearing. The respondent was ordered to pay costs to the petitioners, and the court rejected the respondent&#039;s request for a stay on the appointment of the court receiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1459 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295800</link>
      <description>The court set aside the consent decree dated 16th September 2012, appointed a court receiver to take possession of the suit premises, and directed the trial court to expedite the suit&#039;s hearing. The respondent was ordered to pay costs to the petitioners, and the court rejected the respondent&#039;s request for a stay on the appointment of the court receiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>