<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1753 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295810</link>
    <description>A defect in the suit property description may amount to a formal defect under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC if it creates a serious identification problem and may render any decree inexecutable. The court may permit withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh suit only where it is satisfied that the suit must fail by reason of such a defect or other sufficient grounds. On the facts, the property was described with an incorrect survey number, while the revenue records and settlement deed referred to a different survey number, affecting identification of the subject matter. The defect was treated as formal, and withdrawal with liberty to institute a fresh suit was held permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1753 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295810</link>
      <description>A defect in the suit property description may amount to a formal defect under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC if it creates a serious identification problem and may render any decree inexecutable. The court may permit withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh suit only where it is satisfied that the suit must fail by reason of such a defect or other sufficient grounds. On the facts, the property was described with an incorrect survey number, while the revenue records and settlement deed referred to a different survey number, affecting identification of the subject matter. The defect was treated as formal, and withdrawal with liberty to institute a fresh suit was held permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>