https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295807 The court denied the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to have only one authority proceed against them for exports. The court held that different authorities could act on the same transaction under different legislations. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Customs Authorities were directed to provide details of the summons and actions taken. No interim order was issued, and respondents were given three weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition. The court reserved the question of the writ petition's maintainability for future review. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295807 The court denied the petitioner's request for a writ of mandamus to have only one authority proceed against them for exports. The court held that different authorities could act on the same transaction under different legislations. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Customs Authorities were directed to provide details of the summons and actions taken. No interim order was issued, and respondents were given three weeks to file an affidavit-in-opposition. The court reserved the question of the writ petition's maintainability for future review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295807