<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1938 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295813</link>
    <description>The National Green Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction is confined to the routes expressly created by the Water Act, the Air Act and the National Green Tribunal Act. A direct appeal against the original order of the Pollution Control Board was held not maintainable where the statutory first appeal remained pending, and the Tribunal could not bypass that sequence. Directions under Section 31A of the Air Act, including composite orders containing them, were also held not appealable to the Tribunal because the Air Act provides no corresponding appellate route. The Tribunal likewise could not invoke necessity or general judicial review to assume jurisdiction over a Section 18 Water Act order, as it has no free-standing writ-like power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 09:33:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1938 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295813</link>
      <description>The National Green Tribunal&#039;s appellate jurisdiction is confined to the routes expressly created by the Water Act, the Air Act and the National Green Tribunal Act. A direct appeal against the original order of the Pollution Control Board was held not maintainable where the statutory first appeal remained pending, and the Tribunal could not bypass that sequence. Directions under Section 31A of the Air Act, including composite orders containing them, were also held not appealable to the Tribunal because the Air Act provides no corresponding appellate route. The Tribunal likewise could not invoke necessity or general judicial review to assume jurisdiction over a Section 18 Water Act order, as it has no free-standing writ-like power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>