<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25731</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee-company, M/s. Golcha Properties (Private) Ltd., in a case involving the interpretation of sections 220(1) and 220(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a company in liquidation. The court held that interest under section 220(2) was not chargeable post the winding-up order under the Companies Act, emphasizing the precedence of specific Companies Act provisions over general Income-tax Act provisions in such situations. The decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer and settling the legal questions in favor of the company without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25731</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee-company, M/s. Golcha Properties (Private) Ltd., in a case involving the interpretation of sections 220(1) and 220(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a company in liquidation. The court held that interest under section 220(2) was not chargeable post the winding-up order under the Companies Act, emphasizing the precedence of specific Companies Act provisions over general Income-tax Act provisions in such situations. The decision affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, emphasizing the limited jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer and settling the legal questions in favor of the company without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>