https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295777 A civil court has no inherent power to review its own concluded findings; review exists only if conferred by statute and only within the limits of that statute. The narrow exception permitting correction of a procedural or inadvertent error on the court's own motion does not extend to reopening a substantive finding already decided on merits. On the facts stated, the conclusion that the question of tenancy did not arise was a substantive determination, not a procedural step, so it could not be revisited suo motu merely because it was later viewed as erroneous. The resulting review order was without jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:43:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295777 A civil court has no inherent power to review its own concluded findings; review exists only if conferred by statute and only within the limits of that statute. The narrow exception permitting correction of a procedural or inadvertent error on the court's own motion does not extend to reopening a substantive finding already decided on merits. On the facts stated, the conclusion that the question of tenancy did not arise was a substantive determination, not a procedural step, so it could not be revisited suo motu merely because it was later viewed as erroneous. The resulting review order was without jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295777