https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295775 The Special Leave Petition was dismissed as the petitioner's application seeking information on a judicial officer's decision under the RTI Act was deemed impermissible. The High Court's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld, emphasizing that seeking reasons for judicial decisions through the RTI Act could compromise judicial independence. The Court clarified that judges are not obligated to provide additional reasons beyond those in their judgments, protecting the sanctity of judicial decisions and the independence of the judiciary. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2021 14:55:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295775 The Special Leave Petition was dismissed as the petitioner's application seeking information on a judicial officer's decision under the RTI Act was deemed impermissible. The High Court's decision to dismiss the writ petition was upheld, emphasizing that seeking reasons for judicial decisions through the RTI Act could compromise judicial independence. The Court clarified that judges are not obligated to provide additional reasons beyond those in their judgments, protecting the sanctity of judicial decisions and the independence of the judiciary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295775