https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295770 A recall or review-like challenge to a company court order sanctioning amalgamation can be maintained only by a person who can show a direct legal interest and status as an aggrieved person. Mere invocation of Rules 6 and 9 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not cure the absence of locus standi, and inherent powers cannot be used to bypass that threshold. Allegations of fraud do not dispense with the need to demonstrate maintainable standing, and a non-party with no pleaded basis for a public interest-style challenge cannot seek recall of the amalgamation order. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:17:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295770 A recall or review-like challenge to a company court order sanctioning amalgamation can be maintained only by a person who can show a direct legal interest and status as an aggrieved person. Mere invocation of Rules 6 and 9 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not cure the absence of locus standi, and inherent powers cannot be used to bypass that threshold. Allegations of fraud do not dispense with the need to demonstrate maintainable standing, and a non-party with no pleaded basis for a public interest-style challenge cannot seek recall of the amalgamation order. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295770