https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408687 Further investigation in respect of the ECIR was treated as capable of continuing despite the absence of an express permission noted in the process-issuing order, because the complaint had sought leave for further investigation and the supervisory power to secure a fair and just investigation remained relevant. On the material placed, an arguable issue was found to exist, so continuation was allowed subject to the writ petition's outcome. Limited interim protection from coercive action was also considered appropriate for a petitioner facing summons, while requiring cooperation with the investigating authority. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:13:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408687 Further investigation in respect of the ECIR was treated as capable of continuing despite the absence of an express permission noted in the process-issuing order, because the complaint had sought leave for further investigation and the supervisory power to secure a fair and just investigation remained relevant. On the material placed, an arguable issue was found to exist, so continuation was allowed subject to the writ petition's outcome. Limited interim protection from coercive action was also considered appropriate for a petitioner facing summons, while requiring cooperation with the investigating authority. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408687