<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 564 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408668</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of vehicle expenses made by the AO for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning valid, noting the consistent nature of the assessee&#039;s claims supported by documents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 564 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408668</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of vehicle expenses made by the AO for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning valid, noting the consistent nature of the assessee&#039;s claims supported by documents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>