<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1235 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295740</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the application for 80G exemption under the I.T. Act, 1961. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness, emphasizing the need to provide opportunities to rectify defects and ensure proper documentation before denying tax exemptions. The ITAT directed the ld. CIT to reconsider the matter, trace the missing 12A certificate, provide a copy, and then decide on the 80G registration issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1235 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295740</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the application for 80G exemption under the I.T. Act, 1961. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural fairness, emphasizing the need to provide opportunities to rectify defects and ensure proper documentation before denying tax exemptions. The ITAT directed the ld. CIT to reconsider the matter, trace the missing 12A certificate, provide a copy, and then decide on the 80G registration issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>