<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25712</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the penalty order imposed on the assessee for concealing income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter for fresh evidence was deemed lawful under section 254, allowing for corrective measures to ensure justice. The court clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s actions did not contravene section 275, which sets a limitation period for penalty proceedings, as the Tribunal&#039;s powers are not bound by the same restrictions as the primary authority. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the imposition of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 30 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25712</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the penalty order imposed on the assessee for concealing income under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter for fresh evidence was deemed lawful under section 254, allowing for corrective measures to ensure justice. The court clarified that the Tribunal&#039;s actions did not contravene section 275, which sets a limitation period for penalty proceedings, as the Tribunal&#039;s powers are not bound by the same restrictions as the primary authority. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the imposition of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>