<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1926 (8) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295738</link>
    <description>The Special Bench held that under Mahomedan Law, co-parceners have the right of pre-emption against each other, overturning the previous Full Bench decision in *Lalla Nowbut Lall v. Lalla Jewan Lall*. The plaintiffs were granted a decree for one-half of the property subject to pre-emption upon payment of half the purchase money. All judges on the Special Bench concurred with this decision, emphasizing the consistent support for this right in Mahomedan Law authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1926 (8) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295738</link>
      <description>The Special Bench held that under Mahomedan Law, co-parceners have the right of pre-emption against each other, overturning the previous Full Bench decision in *Lalla Nowbut Lall v. Lalla Jewan Lall*. The plaintiffs were granted a decree for one-half of the property subject to pre-emption upon payment of half the purchase money. All judges on the Special Bench concurred with this decision, emphasizing the consistent support for this right in Mahomedan Law authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>