<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 29 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25710</link>
    <description>Section 80J relief is available where the undertaking is a new industrial unit and not a reconstruction of an business. Reconstruction requires substantial continuity of the same business, usually with transfer of old assets into a revived undertaking. On the stated facts, the earlier factory was destroyed by fire, the old product ceased, fresh licences and a new power connection were obtained, new machinery was imported and installed, and the new unit manufactured a distinct product. Those features showed a fresh industrial undertaking rather than a resuscitated old business, so the reconstruction bar under section 80J(4)(i) did not apply and relief under section 80J(1) remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 29 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25710</link>
      <description>Section 80J relief is available where the undertaking is a new industrial unit and not a reconstruction of an business. Reconstruction requires substantial continuity of the same business, usually with transfer of old assets into a revived undertaking. On the stated facts, the earlier factory was destroyed by fire, the old product ceased, fresh licences and a new power connection were obtained, new machinery was imported and installed, and the new unit manufactured a distinct product. Those features showed a fresh industrial undertaking rather than a resuscitated old business, so the reconstruction bar under section 80J(4)(i) did not apply and relief under section 80J(1) remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>