https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295735 After cognizance, framing of charge, and discharge of some accused, a Magistrate cannot direct re-investigation or further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on a de facto complainant's application, because that would amount to an impermissible review of a concluded order under Section 362. Further investigation remains available at the instance of the investigating agency, and if material emerges during trial against discharged persons, the proper course is recourse to Section 319. The Magistrate's direction was therefore without jurisdiction, and the High Court's interference was upheld. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 03 Sep 2023 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295735 After cognizance, framing of charge, and discharge of some accused, a Magistrate cannot direct re-investigation or further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on a de facto complainant's application, because that would amount to an impermissible review of a concluded order under Section 362. Further investigation remains available at the instance of the investigating agency, and if material emerges during trial against discharged persons, the proper course is recourse to Section 319. The Magistrate's direction was therefore without jurisdiction, and the High Court's interference was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295735