https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295733 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when the acquittal is unreasonable or perverse and the record gives clear assurance of guilt. Related-witness testimony is not to be rejected merely because of relationship if it is otherwise reliable and supported by surrounding circumstances. On the evidence of the eyewitness, prompt complaint, medical evidence matching the injuries, and motive, the prosecution case was found consistent. The objections based on delay in forwarding the FIR and undigested food in the stomach were held insufficient to discredit the evidence, and the reversal of acquittal and conviction for murder with common intention were upheld. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:01:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295733 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only when the acquittal is unreasonable or perverse and the record gives clear assurance of guilt. Related-witness testimony is not to be rejected merely because of relationship if it is otherwise reliable and supported by surrounding circumstances. On the evidence of the eyewitness, prompt complaint, medical evidence matching the injuries, and motive, the prosecution case was found consistent. The objections based on delay in forwarding the FIR and undigested food in the stomach were held insufficient to discredit the evidence, and the reversal of acquittal and conviction for murder with common intention were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295733