https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295732 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the judgment is perverse, unreasonable, or ignores material evidence, because acquittal strengthens the presumption of innocence. The Court also reiterated that appellate review of acquittal may reappreciate evidence with caution, and may intervene where misreading or omission of relevant material causes miscarriage of justice. Applying that approach, the eye-witness, injured witness, and medical evidence were found mutually consistent on the core , minor discrepancies were treated as non-fatal, and the mob's entry, assault on vital parts, and shared common object established constructive liability. The acquittal was set aside and the convictions and sentences were restored. en-us Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295732 Interference with an acquittal is justified only when the judgment is perverse, unreasonable, or ignores material evidence, because acquittal strengthens the presumption of innocence. The Court also reiterated that appellate review of acquittal may reappreciate evidence with caution, and may intervene where misreading or omission of relevant material causes miscarriage of justice. Applying that approach, the eye-witness, injured witness, and medical evidence were found mutually consistent on the core , minor discrepancies were treated as non-fatal, and the mob's entry, assault on vital parts, and shared common object established constructive liability. The acquittal was set aside and the convictions and sentences were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295732