https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295730 Recoveries made pursuant to disclosure statements, without test identification parade, in-court identification, or recent possession, were held insufficient to sustain adverse inference against the accused. The presumption under Section 114 Illustration (a) of the Evidence Act depends on the facts, the time gap, and the nature of the recovered property; where the items are readily transferable and the recovery is remote from the offence, no safe presumption of participation in dacoity or murder arises. Interference with an acquittal remains limited and is justified only when the judgment is perverse or exceptional circumstances exist. On these principles, the acquittal was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:21:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295730 Recoveries made pursuant to disclosure statements, without test identification parade, in-court identification, or recent possession, were held insufficient to sustain adverse inference against the accused. The presumption under Section 114 Illustration (a) of the Evidence Act depends on the facts, the time gap, and the nature of the recovered property; where the items are readily transferable and the recovery is remote from the offence, no safe presumption of participation in dacoity or murder arises. Interference with an acquittal remains limited and is justified only when the judgment is perverse or exceptional circumstances exist. On these principles, the acquittal was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295730