<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 552 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408656</link>
    <description>A benami plea fails where the statutory bar applies and the claimed coparcenary exception is not established; the document notes that the purchase money was not proved to have come from the alleged source, so title under the sale deeds prevailed. A Will will not be accepted as valid unless due execution and attestation are satisfactorily proved and suspicious circumstances are dispelled by reliable evidence; here, proof remained deficient. On partition, only the properties found to be jointly partible could be divided, while those in the exclusive domain of one party were excluded, and the share allocation was adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 552 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408656</link>
      <description>A benami plea fails where the statutory bar applies and the claimed coparcenary exception is not established; the document notes that the purchase money was not proved to have come from the alleged source, so title under the sale deeds prevailed. A Will will not be accepted as valid unless due execution and attestation are satisfactorily proved and suspicious circumstances are dispelled by reliable evidence; here, proof remained deficient. On partition, only the properties found to be jointly partible could be divided, while those in the exclusive domain of one party were excluded, and the share allocation was adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>