<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 3 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25706</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for applying a net profit rate to luggage receipts. It was determined that no additional expenses were incurred for earning luggage receipts, and the expenses allowed against passenger receipts adequately covered any expenditure. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues, directing the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 3 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25706</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for applying a net profit rate to luggage receipts. It was determined that no additional expenses were incurred for earning luggage receipts, and the expenses allowed against passenger receipts adequately covered any expenditure. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues, directing the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>