<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 531 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance of cenvat credit for outward transportation on FOR basis due to lack of specific allegations. However, the disallowance of cenvat credit for landline phones provided at the residence of employees/officers was upheld, with penalties set aside for lack of evidence of mala fide conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:08:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 531 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance of cenvat credit for outward transportation on FOR basis due to lack of specific allegations. However, the disallowance of cenvat credit for landline phones provided at the residence of employees/officers was upheld, with penalties set aside for lack of evidence of mala fide conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>