https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295708 An appellate court will interfere with an acquittal only on compelling and substantial grounds, or where the view taken is clearly unreasonable. Here, the prosecution evidence was weakened by omissions in the complainant's version, doubt about his presence at the spot, unexplained injuries on the accused, uncertainty about the place of occurrence, and material suggesting a mutual clash rather than a one-sided assault. As the record did not displace the plausible view that the complainant party was the aggressor, no ground existed to reverse the acquittal. The High Court's order was upheld and the appeals failed. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:35:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295708 An appellate court will interfere with an acquittal only on compelling and substantial grounds, or where the view taken is clearly unreasonable. Here, the prosecution evidence was weakened by omissions in the complainant's version, doubt about his presence at the spot, unexplained injuries on the accused, uncertainty about the place of occurrence, and material suggesting a mutual clash rather than a one-sided assault. As the record did not displace the plausible view that the complainant party was the aggressor, no ground existed to reverse the acquittal. The High Court's order was upheld and the appeals failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295708